What Has Gone Awry at Zipcar – and the UK Vehicle-Sharing Sector Dead?

A community kitchen in Rotherhithe has been delivering a large number of cooked meals each week for two years to elderly residents and vulnerable locals in south London. However, the group's plans face major disruption by the news that they will lose use of New Year’s Day.

The group had relied on Zipcar, the car-sharing company that customers to access its cars via smartphone. The company caused shock through the capital when it said it would cease its UK operations from 1 January.

It will mean many volunteers cannot collect food from the Felix Project, that collects excess produce from supermarkets, cafes and restaurants. Other options are less convenient, costlier, or lack the same convenient access.

“It’s going to be affected massively,” said Vimal Pandya, the project's founder. “My team and I are concerned by the operational hurdle we will face. Many groups like ours will face difficulties.”

“Faced with this reality, they are all worried and thinking: ‘How will we continue?’”

A Significant Setback for Urban Car-Sharing

These volunteers are part of over 500,000 people in London who were car club members, who could be left without convenient access to vehicles, without the hassle and cost of ownership. Most of those members were probably with Zipcar, which held a dominant position in the city.

The planned closure, pending consultation with employees, is a serious setback to hopes that vehicle clubs in urban areas could cut the need for owning a car. However, some analysts have noted that Zipcar’s exit need not spell the end for the concept in Britain.

The Promise of Shared Mobility

Car sharing is prized by city planners and environmentalists as a way of mitigating the ills associated with vehicle ownership. Most cars sit as two-tonne dead weights on the side of the road for 95% of the time, using up space. They also involve large carbon emissions to produce, and people without a vehicle tend to walk, cycle and take transit more. That benefits cities – easing congestion and pollution – and improves public health through increased activity.

Understanding the Decline

The company started in 2000 before being bought by the American rental giant Avis Budget in 2013. Zipcar’s UK income barely registered compared with its parent company's overall annual revenue, and a loss that reached £11.7m in 2024 gave no reason to continue.

Avis Budget has said the closure is part of a “wider restructuring across our global operations, where we are taking targeted actions to simplify processes, improve returns”.

Its latest financial reports said revenues had declined as drivers took less frequent, shorter trips. “This trend reflect the continuing effect of the cost-of-living crisis, which is dampening demand for discretionary spending,” it said.

The Capital's Specific Hurdles

However, several experts noted that London has specific problems that made it much harder for the sector to succeed.

  • Patchwork Policies: Across 33 boroughs, car-club operators face a mosaic of different procedures and costs that made it harder.
  • Congestion Charge: The closure comes as electric cars start paying London’s congestion charge, adding unavoidable costs.
  • Parking Permit Disparity: Locals in some boroughs pay just £63 for a annual electric car parking permit. A floating car club would pay over £1,100 annually, creating a significant barrier.

“We should literally be charged one-twentieth of a private parking cost,” said Robert Schopen of Co Wheels. “We remove vehicles. We’re putting less polluting cars in their place.”

Lessons from Abroad

Other European countries offer examples for London to follow. Germany enacted national car-sharing legislation in 2017, providing a unified system for parking, subsidies and waivers. Now, the country has 5.4 shared cars per 10,000 people, while France has 2.1 and Belgium has 6.3. The UK lags behind at 0.7.

“The evidence shows is that shared mobility around the world, particularly on the continent, is expanding,” commented Bharath Devanathan of Invers.

He suggested authorities should start to treat car sharing as a form of public transport, and link it with train and bus stations. He added that one unnamed client was already seriously considering entering the London market: “There will be fill this gap.”

The Future Landscape

Other players can roughly be divided into two camps:

  1. Fleet Operators: Which maintain their own cars. This includes Denmark’s GreenMobility, France’s Free2Move, and Germany’s Miles Mobility.
  2. Peer-to-Peer Services: Which allow users to rent out their own vehicles via an app – similar to Airbnb for cars. Examples Britain’s Hiyacar and the US’s Getaround and Turo.

Turo, a US-headquartered peer-to-peer platform, is already weighing up the UK gap. Rory Brimmer, its UK managing director, said there was a “significant chance” to win more users. “There is a void that is going to need to be filled, because London still needs to move,” Brimmer said.

However, it could take some time for other players to establish themselves. For now, more people may feel forced to buy cars, and many across London will be left without access.

For the volunteers in Rotherhithe, the next month will be a rush to find a solution. The logistical challenge caused by Zipcar’s exit underscores the wider implications of its departure on vital services and the future of car-sharing in the UK.

James Perkins
James Perkins

Lena is a passionate writer and digital strategist with a background in philosophy, sharing her insights on contemporary issues.