🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions suggested that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."